The Companies Act of 2008, does not make full provision for the dissolution and liquidation of a company in financial distress. Instead, the Companies Act of 1973 continues to apply. Schedule 5, Section 9 of the Companies Act of 2008 states :
- Continued application of previous Act to winding-up and liquidation:
(1) Despite the repeal of the previous Act (Companies Act of 1973), until the date determined in terms of subitem (4), Chapter 14 of that Act continues to apply with respect to the winding- up and liquidation of companies under this Act, as if that Act had not been repealed subject to subitems (2) and (3).
(2) Despite subitem (1), sections 343, 344, 346, and 348 to 353 do not apply to the winding-up of a solvent company, except to the extent necessary to give full effect to the provisions of Part G of Chapter 2 (deals with winding up of solvent companies – not relevant here).
(3) If there is a conflict between a provision of the previous Act that continues to apply in terms of subitem (1), and a provision of Part G of Chapter 2 of this Act with respect to a solvent company, the provision of this Act prevails.
Thus, an over-indebted company must concern itself with Chapter 14 of the Companies Act of 1973.
Chapter 14, Section 339 of the Companies Act of 1973 states that if the 1973 Act does not provide for a specific matter, the law of insolvency, thus the Insolvency Act of 1936, shall apply as is, with due regard to the necessary changes in wording, to the winding up of a company in financial distress:
Law of insolvency to be applied mutatis mutandis.In the winding-up of a company unable to pay its debts the provisions of the law relating to insolvency shall, in so far as they are applicable, be applied mutatis mutandis in respect of any matter not specially provided for by this Act.
Mutatis Mutandis meaning: as is, but with respect to the necessary changes in wording.